An independent practice in AI governance, audit, architecture and training, led by Frans Vermaak and delivered by the people who wrote the framework.
The people who scope an engagement deliver it. There is no partner-sells-then-hands-to-juniors gap, because the framework was written by the people who apply it.
Engagements are fixed in scope and duration and say so before signature. TechSight 90 publishes its own limits: one use case, one to ten systems, joint delivery. Scope creep is the failure that methodology exists to prevent.
Everything we recommend runs on our own platform first. That is not a marketing line; it is why the control catalogue has the shape it does.
Worth stating plainly, because a governance practice that oversells destroys the trust it is selling.
We do not provide legal, statutory audit, or formal regulatory assurance services, and we are not registered with IRBA. Our assessments are technical: they produce findings, observations and recommendations, never an opinion.
Any figure on this site traces to something you can check. Where we have no number, we say so rather than reach for a plausible one.
You will not find a logo wall here. Client work is referenced only where the client has agreed in writing.
Two hours, scored against the catalogue, and a written scorecard you keep.